The Australian Dispute Resolution Research Network’s recent four-part series by Dr. Peter Condliffe, Past-Chair of the Australian Mediator and Dispute Resolution Accreditation Standards (AMDRAS) Board explores the evolution of mediation in Australia and its growing influence in the global dispute resolution community.
The following article provides a summary and links to this four-part series. 
Whether you’re a legal professional, mediator, or simply interested in the Alternative Dispute Resolution landscape, these articles offers critical insights into the evolving global mediation field.
- Part 1, Background. In this article Dr. Condliffe expands on his presentation at the 2024 Australian Dispute Resolution Association International Mediation Conference, examining how Australia’s decentralised yet robust system, with its cross-disciplinary approach, has helped position the profession as a leader in dispute resolution – and able to adapt to trends identified in the international mediation field.
Dr. Condliffe also shares insights from his involvement with First Nations communities and the challenge of adapting mediation practices to different cultural settings. Read Part 1 here.
- Part 2, The Evolution of the Australian Way, Australia has a unique approach to mediation standards, but how does it compare globally? explores the evolution of the National Mediator Accreditation System (NMAS), its decentralised, voluntary approach, and how it balances local needs with national cohesion—setting the stage for the recent transition to AMDRAS. Read Part 2 here.
- Part 3, The Review delves into the recent review and changes that have lead to AMDRAS. Peter highlights some of the research and explores the reasoning behind expanded training, new accreditation levels and specialisations, and how these are all designed to meet diverse needs and elevate professional standards in conflict management. Read Part 3 Here.
-
Part 4, How does Australia’s approach to mediation compare to international standards and practices?
This fourth and final installment of Dr. Peter Condliffe’s article series explores the evolution of mediation, specifically Australia’s position relative to jurisdictions like New Zealand, Singapore, and the USA. Key insights cover regulation, accreditation systems, mediation styles, and emerging specialisations, providing a comprehensive view of how Australia fits into the evolving global mediation landscape. Read Part 4 Here.
The AMDRAS Board would like to thank Dr. Peter Condliffe, Past-Chair of the Australian Mediator and Dispute Resolution Accreditation Standards (AMDRAS) Board for sharing his insights on this significant topic. His expertise, dedication, and ability to articulate the complexities of the evolving mediation landscape have provided invaluable perspectives for practitioners and stakeholders alike.